242. The Strange Matter of Job Incompetence

Some peo­ple are very good at their jobs. Some jobs are pretty easy to be good at. In my expe­ri­ence, extremely large num­bers of peo­ple are rather bad at their jobs, and a fair num­ber are a down­right men­ace. In fact in some occu­pa­tions, most peo­ple are quite bad at it. For exam­ple, look­ing back ratio­nally with a 66 year score­card, around 80% of the med­ical doc­tors I’ve encoun­tered have been use­less to dan­ger­ous, at least for my needs. As a teacher, it also pains me to say that a very high per­cent­age of teach­ers and lec­tur­ers are inept at best. Why is this so? There seems to be no sim­ple con­nec­tion with intel­li­gence or length of train­ing.  I have heard that truck dri­vers who are too bright are dan­ger­ous (they get bored), or too slow wit­ted, also risky (they can’t make the nec­es­sary quick traf­fic judge­ments).  The most likely fac­tor for wide­spread incom­pe­tence how­ever may be whether indi­vid­ual job tasks vary much. On a pro­duc­tion line, it doesn’t vary, so you want some­one sub­mis­sive with no imag­i­na­tion (and that is what many edu­ca­tion sys­tems aim to pro­duce). In med­i­cine, patients are immensely vari­able, so you want a medico with sci­en­tific curios­ity, alert to the unusual, and who can think out­side of the box when nec­es­sary.  In fact most medicos by char­ac­ter and train­ing seem to act more like tech­ni­cians. They have mem­o­rized a cat­a­logue of pro­ce­dures and apply them to invented “dis­ease” cat­e­gories, regard­less of the patient. Hence their level of fail­ure. Sim­i­larly the vast major­ity of teach­ers (and the insti­tu­tions they work for) fol­low a rigid “cur­ricu­lum” which eval­u­ates stu­dents for their con­for­mity to the plan, regard­less of real per­sonal stu­dent learn­ing. Teach­ers are actu­ally required to do this, on pain of los­ing their jobs. If true teacher pro­duc­tiv­ity is mul­ti­ply­ing stu­dent learn­ing pro­duc­tiv­ity, teach­ers are often required to be unpro­duc­tive. Sim­i­larly, many occu­pa­tions require work­ers to be unpro­duc­tive, if pro­duc­tiv­ity means doing a job well. What a strange world.

Posted in human nature | Leave a comment

241. Sell It!

Over two thou­sand years ago, there was a philoso­pher, Laozi, who was sure that peo­ple were nat­u­rally good (some­one called Jesus Christ had the same idea). About the same time another char­ac­ter, Shâng Yâng, reck­oned they were nat­u­rally bad and invented an impres­sive list of pun­ish­ments. Funny, ancient his­tory seems to give us no wise guys who thought that peo­ple were nat­u­rally suck­ers. How did they miss such a deep human truth? Give me a rea­son, any rea­son, that your scam or your wid­get will work and I can sell it. It’s the story that sells, not the balm or the wid­get. (Well, except to a few bor­ing char­ac­ters who actu­ally want facts). Peo­ple always want to believe in some­thing, tai­lored in sim­plic­ity to their intel­li­gence. It just needs Joe Blogs to be given an attrac­tive rea­son and he’ll believe that the moon is made of cheese, so find out what he thinks adds up to an attrac­tive rea­son. Few peo­ple will admit that their own judge­ment is poor. Actu­ally the evi­dence for com­mon bad judge­ment is over­whelm­ing (e.g. exibit A: mar­riage with a 50% national fail­ure rate). How lucky. Since so many indi­vid­u­als make such infal­li­bly bad choices, the mar­ket has no ratio­nal bound­aries. A crooked oper­a­tor can par­ley almost any­thing into a dol­lar. Heck, even an hon­est man can sell fridges to Eski­mos.

(also see http://thormay.net/unwiseideas/aphorism.html for this and other Short­cuts)

Posted in human nature, skulduggery, wisdom | Leave a comment

240. Women, Men and Religion

Men find secu­rity in phys­i­cal dom­i­nance. With­out that dom­i­nance most men feel sex­u­ally cas­trated. Lack­ing phys­i­cal dom­i­nance (on the whole) women often seek secu­rity in deceit, or fail­ing that, in magic. Magic is broadly expressed as spir­i­tu­al­ity. Magic, sorted as orga­nized self-delu­sion, then bet­ter, a shared delu­sion, is what we call reli­gion. This reli­gious magic is potent stuff for con­trol­ling human beings, since few are dri­ven by impar­tial evi­dence based think­ing. Per­ceiv­ing the power of reli­gious magic, men hijack the for­mula by force and kick women out of the tem­ple. Thus all reli­gions which pro­gress to gov­ern­ing the lives of cit­i­zens are based on male sex­ual inse­cu­rity sanc­ti­fied by the state. [a ref­er­ence: http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/world/secrets-of-divine-women-exposed-20120407-1wi1j.html ]

Posted in human nature, power, religion, values, wisdom | Leave a comment

239. The Competing Engines of Action: Greed and Benevolence

The sales­man and the teacher share much in method and imme­di­ate pur­pose. Both wish to move other human beings to deci­sive action, and in that quest they engage the target’s moti­va­tion. Each how­ever is dri­ven by a dif­fer­ent per­sonal need, and trans­mits quite dif­fer­ent out­comes. The sales­man is (at bot­tom) dri­ven by greed, and seeks to exploit weak­ness. To achieve suc­cess, he encour­ages desire, or even lust in the buyer. The long term out­come of the result­ing “con­sumer cul­ture” – a cul­ti­vated cul­ture of greed, desire and quick grat­i­fi­ca­tion – is a wide­spread feel­ing of empti­ness and dis­con­tent. Lust is never sat­is­fied. The teacher (that is a teacher by nature rather than mere title) is dri­ven by benev­o­lence, and seeks to opti­mise the poten­tials of his stu­dents. To achieve suc­cess, he cul­ti­vates curi­ousity, inquiry and dili­gence in the learner. The long term out­come of the result­ing cul­ture of learn­ing is life­long per­sonal growth, a plea­sure in shar­ing and help­ing, and a strong value in doing things well. Benev­o­lence often, per­haps usu­ally, loses to greed. Why? Greed is urgent, the grat­i­fi­ca­tion of hot desire is a quick burn, and never mind the quick burnout to fol­low. Benif­i­cence is merely warm and endur­ing.

Posted in human nature, values, wisdom | Leave a comment

238. Racism and the Paradoxes of Miscommunicaiton

It is an axiom that we will be mis­un­der­stood. “All the world old is queer save thee and me, and even thou art a lit­tle queer” [Robert Owen 1771–1858]. It is chis­elled in stone that our writ­ing will be mis­un­der­stood. In every “lit­er­ate” nation, approx­i­mately 50% of the pop­u­la­tion is not lit­er­ate enough to prop­erly decode a news­pa­per, and in Aus­tralia appar­ently only about 16% of peo­ple can com­pare the ideas in two news­pa­per edi­to­ri­als. There­fore, if the topic is con­tro­ver­sial, mil­lions are guar­an­teed NOT to decode the writer’s mean­ing, but to insert their own pre­con­cep­tions. Given all this, per­haps what fol­lows is not sur­pris­ing:
Con­tinue read­ing

Posted in human nature, values | Leave a comment

237. What is a Civilization?

A civ­i­liza­tion is a shared sys­tem of val­ues. To those not shar­ing the par­tic­u­lar val­ues, that civ­i­liza­tion may appear defi­cient, even unciv­i­lized. Then we have a clash of civ­i­liza­tions. Inter­na­tional agree­ments try to man­age clash­ing civ­i­liza­tions, and mostly rely on armies to back up the deals. How­ever, the main prob­lems with civ­i­liza­tions are inter­nal. Almost always there are large num­bers of peo­ple who pri­vately do not believe in the core val­ues of their civ­i­liza­tion, but pub­licly pre­tend to do so. After all, it is a big ask to have mil­lions of peo­ple with rad­i­cally dif­fer­ent agen­das shar­ing a sys­tem of val­ues. Those who secretly dis­agree with pub­lic val­ues are often amongst the most ambi­tious mem­bers of a par­tic­u­lar civ­i­liza­tion, indeed fre­quently its lead­ers. The upshot is a cor­rup­tion of ide­al­ized val­ues by one means or another. Over decades and cen­turies lead­ers will seek to rein­ter­pret pub­lic val­ues. This might be nec­es­sary, for in a chang­ing world old ideas may no longer be prac­ti­cal. Many hid­den changes how­ever will be for the per­sonal advan­tage of lead­ers. A typ­i­cal pat­tern of cor­rupted val­ues might result in, for exam­ple, the degra­da­tion of women, exploit­ing the less lucky, restrict­ing oppor­tu­nity to cer­tain social classes, or the dou­ble-speak abuse of ideas like ‘free­dom’, ‘the peo­ple’, ‘equal­ity’, ‘order’, ‘sub­ver­sion’ … and so on. Past and present it is pretty hard to think of any civ­i­liza­tion, Chris­tian, Islamic, Bud­dhist, Com­mu­nist, Fas­cist, Dic­ta­to­rial, Lib­er­tar­ian, Demo­c­ra­tic, Social­ist, Cap­i­tal­ist, or what­ever, which has remained mostly decent at its polit­i­cal and social core. ‘Decent’ here is defined by the orig­i­nat­ing ideas of right and wrong within each civ­i­liza­tion. Thus all civ­i­liza­tions are unsta­ble, have moral crises, and may fail, though the peo­ple in them ‘go on’. Per­haps they then accept belief in some new model. Each ‘new civ­i­liza­tion’ will also, of course, even­tu­ally be weak­ened by the cor­rup­tion and abuse of its new val­ues. Now think hard and name your own exam­ples.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

236. Eyes Wide Shut, and Energy of the Human Kind

What do you see when you see? What do you hear when you hear? Dur­ing World War II the Aus­tralian mil­i­tary com­mand brought some New Guinea vil­lage chiefs to see the city of Bris­bane. Shock and awe? They went home and excit­edly told their coun­try­men about the dif­fer­ent trees and ani­mals. They had noth­ing to say about the sky­scrap­ers and trains. Well, of course. Now take young adults, whom I have spent a 34 year career teach­ing. They come with var­i­ous poses. a) Some are too self involved to notice any­thing; b) Some live for fash­ion and boy/girl approval; c) Some find the world full of laugh­ter and friend­ship; d) Some notice that the world is full of rivals and liars; e) Some notice that there is injus­tice every­where; f) Some feel that ene­mies and dan­ger can­cel out hope for a bet­ter world … and so it goes. But the really inter­est­ing ques­tion is what they do about all this stuff they notice. The short answer, after a some party hero­ics early on, is mostly … not much. At bot­tom many want a sleepy com­fort zone. True energy of the human kind, to move and shake usual “real­ity”, is a very scarce resource.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment